X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 00:39:58 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1224102@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <WarbirdAeroPress@cox.net>
Received: from [66.0.127.69] (HELO simonbelmont)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.2)
  with ESMTPS id 1224090 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 00:31:56 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.0.127.69; envelope-from=WarbirdAeroPress@cox.net
Received: (qmail 23544 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jul 2006 04:21:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO DellXPS) (66.155.206.98)
  by linuxmail.guest2web with SMTP; 5 Jul 2006 04:21:13 -0000
X-Original-Message-ID: <012a01c69feb$d34f5340$5a01fc0a@DellXPS>
From: "Scotty G" <WarbirdAeroPress@cox.net>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-1224058@logan.com>
Subject: Hartzell vs. MT
X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 21:31:02 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869

Hi Gang,

Just curious... Have any of you LNC2 drivers had a chance to compare a 
Hartzell and an MT prop - apples to apples on one airplane test flown under 
similar conditions? I'm curious what the speeds were for the same power 
settings.

Thanks in advance.


Scotty G
UnleashedAirRacing.com
SeptemberPops.com
WarbirdAeroPress.com