X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-PolluStop: No license found, only first 5 messages were scanned Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:00:03 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from host421.ipowerweb.com ([72.22.69.104] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.1) with SMTP id 1203340 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 08:20:42 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=72.22.69.104; envelope-from=bjburr@mwheli.com Received: (qmail 22423 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2006 12:08:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mountain0676a7) (24.10.172.111) by host421.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 23 Jun 2006 12:08:48 -0000 Reply-To: From: X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] MT Props X-Original-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 06:19:50 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <001a01c696bf$536f97a0$0500a8c0@mountain0676a7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 In-Reply-To: I have found Doug Turner at MT USA in DeLand, FL to be very accommodating and helpful on all of my MT propeller needs. There is a 5 year overhaul life so if you are at 7 years you may have a problem with this. Otherwise I would think they would make some adjustment for you. Bryan N132BB -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of n98pb@sbcglobal.net Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 10:45 PM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] MT Props Just got some very interesting news from American Propeller in Redding, CA. Seems all four of the blades were found to have cracks at the hub where the lag bolt enter the wood and they are no longer serviceable. I had called American in the past and asked about some wrinkling of the paint at the hub and was advised that it was normal due to shrinking wood core material. I will be contacting MT to see what they will do with the prop, expect not much, as it is seven years old, about six years of use as the plane was down with panel changes and painting over the seven year period. This means new prop. Seems like MT is not the prop for these applications. I'm going to investigate the alternatives and unless MT makes good on it I won't be using their equipment in the future and will advise here on the outcome. American said that they have seen this in the past but couldn't recall one on the IVP application. Todd at American is sending me a written description of their inspection results before I call MT. Has anyone else had an issue like this with their MT propeller? Pat Brunner N98PB -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/