Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:20:42 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1154187@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.123.212.134; envelope-from=aflyer@lazy8.net
From: John Huft <aflyer@lazy8.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [LML] flex tube
References: <list-1153568@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-1153568@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

http://www.turbohoses.com/Turbo%20Hose.htm

I use these (the 2 ply version) on my high speed RV8.

Can't wait for the Airventure Cup race!!

John
Race 18

p.s. I see Graybeard is in a class by himself. I guess we knew that.
c'mon you guys!


Paul Lipps wrote:
> Chris!
>     If Greenbacks has an O-360, then without induction losses, and no 
> dynamic pressure, his engine would be taking in 4.69 cu.ft./ sec. In a 
> lossless duct 2.5" in diameter, the duct velocity would be 137.5 
> ft./sec./ 93.8 mph (81.5 kts for you upside-down blokes!). I wouldn't 
> think that the corrugated SCAT tubing would contribute a lot to smooth, 
> lossless flow, even in a very short section. The way I look at it is to 
> take care of all of the little details and the larger issues will be 
> resolved.