X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 00:32:18 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <5zq@cox.net> Received: from eastrmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.240.37] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1147087 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 21:43:03 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.240.37; envelope-from=5zq@cox.net Received: from OFFICE ([68.110.252.196]) by eastrmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with SMTP id <20060609014218.SVYP15470.eastrmmtao02.cox.net@OFFICE> for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 21:42:18 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <007401c68b65$ec0ef9c0$6401a8c0@OFFICE> From: "Bill&Sue" <5zq@cox.net> X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LNC2 Air Induction Tube X-Original-Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 21:42:08 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Angier, What I used is just some flexible baffling material between the cowling and the airbox. Remember, 99.9% of the time there is VERY little relative movement between the airframe and engine. The most relative movement occurs at start up and shut down. Bill Harrelson N5ZQ 320 1200 hrs N6ZQ IV 8.9237% > I'm currently trying to decide what material is best to use for a flexible > connection between the cowl air inlet and my air filter box. > Is CAT duct the best solution or are there other flexible tube/ducting > possibilities? 2.25 to 2.5" ID would appear to be a good size. > > Thanks in advance. > > Angier Ames