X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [67.8.183.219] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 5.0.9)
  with HTTP id 1120965 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 20 May 2006 06:55:55 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Lean test results - 360, LSE display
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.0.9
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 06:55:55 -0400
Message-ID: <web-1120965@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <BFF2A5CF4A51DD4A8FCF25A203C2745101A2FE@server1.USTEK>
References: <BFF2A5CF4A51DD4A8FCF25A203C2745101A2FE@server1.USTEK>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Lancair" <lancair@USTEK.COM>:

  So the man with two wristwatches never knows the time?  Two measurements
  of MAP yielding different results is not a reassuring thing.  Were you
  able to check against a gold standard to determine which (if either) was
  correct?  I hope to have my engine checked out on Saturday using some
  sort of magic box, so further flight testing will give us an opportunity
  to run the checks that you have already done.  Data should be
  interesting.  Then to approach Prof. Klaus and ask for clarification and
  explanation.
  
  Robert M. Simon
  ES-P N301ES

"""
  Be cautious of Light Speed Engineering's (LSE) display data.  In my
  Plasma III system, the LSE MAP does not agree with the VM EPI 800
  display although one is tapped off cyl #1 and the other off cyl #4
  respectively.
"""