X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [72.255.30.222] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 5.0.9) with HTTP id 1119793 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 19 May 2006 07:45:11 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: IVP Crash To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.0.9 Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 07:45:11 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <013801c67aca$642979a0$6401a8c0@Rienklaptop1> References: <013801c67aca$642979a0$6401a8c0@Rienklaptop1> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Rienk Ayers" : Jeff, you are probably right about the Lancairs in question being the older two seat variants. Again, I was just quoting him, and I gave a good enough reference that anyone could read the whole article themselves. Though I have flown an L4 and Columbia with the idea of buying one at different times, I do not have even an hour in each type, so I have no way to judge or compare the different models, let alone discern the stability and control nuances - I just knew they were too twitchy for me. Only a qualified engineer could legitimately compare the numbers (derivatives) or an unbiased test pilot be able to discern the differences. My opinions are based upon feedback from qualified people, including professional engineers and test pilots who have flown the Lancairs - and that is as much as I'm going to say about that. My level of expertise has nothing to do with this issue - the numbers speak for themselves. I have yet to hear from a Lancair builder/pilot who even knows what derivatives are, let alone what they mean, and what the numbers actually are for any model of Lancair. To be fair, I sincerely doubt that most designers and manufacturers even know either. But if I were an owner/builder, I would sure hope that someone could give me the answers - at least the theoretical numbers that were calculated in the design process (only wind tunnel testing can completely verify them). don't inquiring minds want to know? Yes, you could simply say that you've flown an airplane, you can live with it's bad characteristics (if any), and make sure you don't "fall of the wall." But if you will recall, this thread got started when Allen Adamson wondered, "what can be done to create a safer lancair record." My suggestion? Don't just teach gymnastics - rather, shorten the wall. RA