X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 18:04:28 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d04.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.36] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1118904 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 18 May 2006 16:08:43 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.157.36; envelope-from=VTAILJEFF@aol.com Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.5.) id q.45e.bd731b (39331) for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 16:07:52 -0400 (EDT) From: VTAILJEFF@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <45e.bd731b.319e2e17@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 16:07:51 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: IVP Crash X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1147982871" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5026 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1147982871 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 5/18/2006 9:41:51 AM Central Standard Time, rienk.ayers@sreyaaviation.com writes: "When, a decade or so ago, Australian authorities refused to license homebuilt Lancairs because they lacked what was officially considered a safe margin of longitudinal stability, designer Lance Neibauer protested that his customers PREFERRED their airplanes unstable. Rienk, I think Peter Garrison that you are quoting above is referring to the 320/360 series aircraft and not the IVP that is the center of this discusion. Have you flown the IVP and evaluated its flying qualities? Are you qualified to do so? Not to appear to be offensive here but are you an aeronautical engineer or possess some other skill, talent, training and background that gives rise to your opinions? Regards, Jeff Edwards LIVP N619SJ -------------------------------1147982871 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 5/18/2006 9:41:51 AM Central Standard Time,=20 rienk.ayers@sreyaaviation.com writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>"When, a=20 decade or so ago, Australian authorities refused to license
homebuilt=20 Lancairs because they lacked what was officially considered a safe
marg= in=20 of longitudinal stability, designer Lance Neibauer protested that=20 his
customers PREFERRED their airplanes unstable.
Rienk,
 
I think Peter Garrison that you are quoting above is referrin= g to=20 the 320/360 series aircraft  and not the IVP that is the center of this= =20 discusion. Have you flown the IVP and evaluated its flying qualities? Are yo= u=20 qualified to do so? Not to appear to be offensive here but are you an=20 aeronautical engineer or possess some other skill, talent, training and=20 background that gives rise to your opinions?
 
Regards,
 
Jeff Edwards
LIVP N619SJ
-------------------------------1147982871--