Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #35986
From: Paul Lipps <elippse@sbcglobal.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: More on bank angle
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 18:03:58 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
'Received the following from someone I had shown the test my friend had performed and the math exercise I did. More food for thought!
 
"I did an article about this a few years ago, and did the same tests myself using a Cherokee Arrow. My impression was that in the heat of the moment it is difficult to maintain bank angle, airspeed etc where you want them, and besides, you need to turn more than 180 degrees because you are essentially doing a procedure turn. I discussed the whole question with Dick Rutan, who at some point did, or had done (I forget which), a bunch of tests for some flight display he was doing or something, and had concluded that 45 degrees is the optimum bank angle for minimum loss of altitude in a power-off turn. I think that can be shown mathematically in a more direct, purer way than the letter suggests, but I don't remember how. Perhaps the best thing to do would be to go wing-vertical at first, and than gradually level out through the turn, maintaining 1 G.

If the crux of the matter is time spent in the turn versus rate of descent, you would think that since speed would increase in proportion to the 2nd or 3rd root of descent rate, it would be a bad idea to let speed build up; but apparently not. In any case, extra speed is extra insurance against a secondary stall when rolling out of the turn."


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster