X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:07:21 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1086321@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <blackoaks@gmail.com>
Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.187] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9)
  with ESMTP id 1085535 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:36:35 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.233.182.187; envelope-from=blackoaks@gmail.com
Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c31so1805138nfb
        for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=X9gwQrcaq7l2em0Y9evnzSd3RsjpqrL5euuQh03JIQpzxAGV/2T1u9v1mPHuh3RaIxTng+wbMRM57GG6YcvQFf4emWu0dve1kEbrPKJPL+r2Smo2SOHH/aVlfQMXVjSR4D8dXOS7WSZ4MsgDjqXO/1nvZ4r28PuNIT8rnwAUuLI=
Received: by 10.49.9.8 with SMTP id m8mr3182524nfi;
        Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.48.238.11 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-Message-ID: <254321ea0604290935y7dd9893t82c938c7c9a61645@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:35:50 -0700
From: "John McMahon" <blackoaks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] AOA
In-Reply-To: <list-1084998@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_12160_6720330.1146328550190"
References: <list-1084998@logan.com>

------=_Part_12160_6720330.1146328550190
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On 4/28/06, Kevin Kossi <kevin@airforcemechanical.com> wrote:
>
> Is it best to get an AOA like Advanced Systems AOA Pro, or does the
> Chelton SV-Sport do the same thing;


I have not flown behind either Advanced Systems AOA or Chelton yet, but we
are putting both in our ES.
For what its worth, I have flown jet fighters and civil jets with and
without AOA and I wouldn't build a panel without AOA info. I have my own
prefrence for a seperate AOA because I believe the information will stand
out more than when in the clutter of the Chelton display. Properly
calibrated it is useful in setting up long range optimum cruise as well as
for max glide and for warning of max AOA.  It is another tool, not the only
answer! My $.02  FWIW...
John McMahon
Lancair Super ES

------=_Part_12160_6720330.1146328550190
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

<br><br><div><span class=3D"gmail_quote">On 4/28/06, <b class=3D"gmail_send=
ername">Kevin Kossi</b> &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:kevin@airforcemechanical.com"=
>kevin@airforcemechanical.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class=3D"gma=
il_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0=
pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Is it best to get an AOA like Advanced Systems AOA Pro, or does the<br>Chel=
ton SV-Sport do the same thing;</blockquote></div><br>I have not flown behi=
nd either Advanced Systems AOA or Chelton yet, but we are putting both in o=
ur ES.
<br>For what its worth, I have flown jet fighters and civil jets with and w=
ithout AOA and I wouldn't build a panel without AOA info. I have my own pre=
frence for a seperate AOA because I believe the information will stand out =
more than when in the clutter of the Chelton display.  Properly calibrated =
it is useful in setting up long range optimum cruise as well as for max gli=
de and for warning of max AOA.&nbsp; It is another tool, not the only answe=
r! My $.02&nbsp; FWIW...
<br>John McMahon<br>Lancair Super ES

------=_Part_12160_6720330.1146328550190--