Return-Path: Received: from smtp11.bellglobal.com ([204.101.251.53]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 7 Oct 1999 17:03:40 -0400 Received: from default (Kingston-ppp64621.sympatico.ca [216.208.85.2]) by smtp11.bellglobal.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA15295 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 1999 17:11:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <020101bf1108$833bad00$0a55d0d8@default> From: "Ian B. Crowe" To: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Prop problems Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 17:11:23 -0400 Organization: Corvi Trade Consultants Inc X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> My two cents Canadian is that you should approach Hartzell and ask them what to do. There is a really neat guy there and yes I have lost his name but he is an engineer who has responsibility for Lancair. I phoned him and he gave me all sorts of info, some of which was supported by test results, some of which he said was his unofficial opinion based on experience. What he did do was to give you a basis to make decisions. It appears to be Hartzell's position that if they have not had it on the front of an aircraft with a particular engine driving it then they cannot give you an unqualified go ahead. I think that is reasonable. However they do have a lot of experience and their informal advice is well informed I also got a lot of information on critical engine speeds. I was looking at a prop that had come from a Mooney and had been running cut down to 70" on the Mooney prior to removal. It was not approved for use on the Mooney at that length. I canned the idea in the end on a weight basis as it was heavy. If I find the guy's name I will post it. If you ask for the engineer that deals with Lancair he should get the same person as I did. Regards Ian Crowe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html