X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 22:43:49 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1077262@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <Christopher.Zavatson@baesystems.com>
Received: from mta-out-1.udlp.com ([207.109.1.8] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9)
  with ESMTP id 1077185 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 21:13:52 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.109.1.8; envelope-from=Christopher.Zavatson@baesystems.com
Received: from mnexch01.MSGDOMAIN.MPLS.UDLP.COM ([10.1.62.20])
	by mta-out-1.udlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3N0fwjJ028144
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:41:59 -0500
Received: from smtp.udlp.com ([10.1.62.22] RDNS failed) by mnexch01.MSGDOMAIN.MPLS.UDLP.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	 Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:06:37 -0500
Received: from DM-MN-06-MTA by smtp.udlp.com
	with Novell_GroupWise; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:11:52 -0500
X-Original-Message-Id: <s44a8e08.011@smtp.udlp.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.6 
X-Original-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:11:43 -0500
From: "Christopher Zavatson" <Christopher.Zavatson@baesystems.com>
X-Original-To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: CHTs
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Apr 2006 01:06:37.0871 (UTC) FILETIME=[2C17F3F0:01C66672]

Walter,
<<OK.  That's not what their Tips Publication says.  Those numbers are 
quite a bit higher than their more recent publications.>>
What are the more recent CHT value/range recommendations coming from
Lycoming?
Are the numbers different for Continentals?
Chris



Chris Zavatson
N91CZ
360std.
www.N91CZ.com