Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #34691
From: Paul Lipps <elippse@sbcglobal.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: spinner-cowl gap
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:21:59 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
    When my plane was inspected by FAA for its Airworthiness, the inspector noted the minimal clearance between my spinner and the cowling; it measured .010" to .015". He asked me if that would not allow it to rub. I said that when I pull power in flight and the prop is pushed back, it will rub, but not for very long. Think abradable seals on jet engine fan and compressor blades. Now when I pull forward on the prop, it's about .03" to .05". Why make it bigger? Engine cooling air from the high pressure plenum tries to come forward around the crankshaft and exit radially through the gap. This causes a flow that disrupts the smooth flow from the spinner and causes it to turbulate back on to the cowling. It is actually preferable to have the cowling 1/8" to 1/4" larger in diameter just behind the spinner with that portion forming a "quarter-round". That forms a Coanda surface which will turn the radial flow 90 degrees to the rear. It is the same principle which is used to decrease drag on the horizontal surface by enlarging and rounding the leading edge of the elevator (ailerons, too) to 10% greater thickness than the stab immediately ahead of it, to cause the stab-elevator gap flow to turn to the rear. See Hoerner's F.D. Drag, P. 5-13, Fig. 28 and Stinton's "The Design of the Airplane", P. 444, Fig. 12.9d.
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster