X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:50:45 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from artemis.email.starband.net ([148.78.247.125] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.7) with ESMTP id 960404 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 03:13:40 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=148.78.247.125; envelope-from=hwasti@starband.net Received: from starband.net (vsat-148-64-23-255.c050.t7.mrt.starband.net [148.64.23.255]) by artemis.email.starband.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0U8CbuQ018199 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 03:12:49 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <43DDCA70.9050605@starband.net> X-Original-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:12:32 -0800 From: "Hamid A. Wasti" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Runway checks, passes, flybys References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.86.2, clamav-milter version 0.86 on artemis X-Virus-Status: Clean Barry Hancock wrote: > First, you would have to give them a reason to do so...and safely > executing the overhead isn't going to be it. I could not resist adding one more thing. You are totally out of touch with reality if you think that a mishap is a prerequisite for the FAA to take action against you. The FAA routinely takes actions against pilots based on violation of regulations even though the flight was completed successfully and safely. Regards, Hamid