X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 01:16:14 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-960331@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <kneadedpleasures@sbcglobal.net>
Received: from web81501.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.199.141] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.7f)
  with SMTP id 957997 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 09:00:15 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.199.141; envelope-from=kneadedpleasures@sbcglobal.net
Received: (qmail 58162 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Jan 2006 13:59:27 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net;
  h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=hWaVBlAxpFfWED6o29e3SZhF/TX9irGonFbGaUboVj/UJ42KJaOxedH7HoexKGYmlNkNHi+p3OguFZTzgItrH7kgDyBrmTqVn+bxgy2s5VOdC66mt1FjG8P54A6Fvsqv8SqDs8Q+UHMlDiUn+loWam90Dk3I0G0Ad77el+/fN4A=  ;
X-Original-Message-ID: <20060129135927.58160.qmail@web81501.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Received: from [71.145.148.154] by web81501.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 29 Jan 2006 05:59:27 PST
X-Original-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 05:59:27 -0800 (PST)
From: kneaded pleasures <kneadedpleasures@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: Lancair Legacy Roll Out  900'?
X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1502165375-1138543167=:57137"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

--0-1502165375-1138543167=:57137
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

    Bill wrote:
    
  "I ain't ever seen a "pretty" 3 pointer in a nosewheel airplane."  
   
  Lorn H. Olsen makes a nice landing in his video recently reported in lml message #34205.  I've repeatedly reviewed it and find not a hint of flare.  It resembles most of my landings except that I consistently enter approach from a higher pattern altitude of 1500 feet as instructed by Don Goetz.  Please find that video at:    
  http://www.dynacomm.ws/~lorn/flight/landing/
   
  I wonder, Bill, if you regularly fly with an aft cg?  I'm not suggesting that it is aft by design or error but rather, that you may be loading it aft with luggage, flight bag and materials, etc.
   
  I've flown 5 different Lancair 200 and 300 series aircraft and none of them behaved any differently than does mine on landing, i.e., no flare.  While I have only 425 hours and 1300 landings in type, I have another 900+ hours and 3000 landings in other aircraft and in all other aircraft types, I have used considerable flare on landing.  I know that you will suggest that my landing techniques need improvement and, indeed, I agree! I will always strive to improve landings but most of them are, and have been, quite good. Several landings have been in severe perpendicular, gusting crosswind conditions with winds in excess of 30 mph which is nearly twice the LNC2 stipulated crosswind component.        Greg Nelson



--0-1502165375-1138543167=:57137
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<DIV id=RTEContent>  <DIV id=RTEContent>  <DIV id=RTEContent><FONT face="Courier New">Bill wrote:</FONT></DIV>  <DIV><FONT face="Courier New">&nbsp; </FONT></DIV>  <DIV><FONT face="Courier New">"I ain't ever seen a "pretty" 3 pointer in a nosewheel airplane."&nbsp; </FONT></DIV>  <DIV><FONT face="Courier New"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>  <DIV><FONT face="Courier New">Lorn&nbsp;H. Olsen&nbsp;makes a nice landing in his video recently reported in lml message #34205.&nbsp; I've repeatedly reviewed it&nbsp;and find not a hint of flare.&nbsp; It resembles most of my landings except that I consistently enter approach from a higher pattern altitude of 1500 feet as instructed by Don Goetz.&nbsp; Please find that video at:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </FONT></DIV>  <DIV><A href="http://www.dynacomm.ws/~lorn/flight/landing/" target=_blank><FONT face="Courier New">http://www.dynacomm.ws/~lorn/flight/landing/</FONT></A></DIV>  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>  <DIV>I wonder, Bill,&nbsp;if you regularly fly with an aft cg?&nbsp;
 I'm not suggesting that it is aft by design or error but rather, that you may be loading it aft with luggage, flight bag and materials, etc.</DIV>  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>  <DIV>I've flown 5 different Lancair 200 and 300 series aircraft and none of them behaved any differently than does mine on landing, i.e., no flare.&nbsp; While I have only 425 hours and 1300 landings in type, I have another 900+ hours and 3000 landings&nbsp;in other aircraft and in all other aircraft types, I have&nbsp;used considerable flare on landing.&nbsp; I know that you will suggest that my landing techniques need improvement and, indeed, I agree! I will always strive to improve landings but most of them are, and have been,&nbsp;quite good. Several&nbsp;landings have been&nbsp;in severe perpendicular, gusting crosswind conditions with&nbsp;winds in excess of 30 mph which is nearly twice the LNC2 stipulated crosswind component.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Greg Nelson</DIV></DIV></DIV>
--0-1502165375-1138543167=:57137--