X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:47:39 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d22.mx.aol.com ([205.188.144.208] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.7f) with ESMTP id 954572 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:52:36 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.144.208; envelope-from=VTAILJEFF@aol.com Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-d22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r6.3.) id q.1ff.10f8a75e (4418) for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:51:49 -0500 (EST) From: VTAILJEFF@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <1ff.10f8a75e.310a3c05@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:51:49 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Runway checks, passes, flybys X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1138287109" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5021 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1138287109 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 1/25/2006 11:31:13 PM Central Standard Time, bnn@nethere.com writes: Just where in the FAR/AIM is the "Overhead approach" defined? And where and in what civil rating is it taught? I know it did not appear in the PTS for the private rating in 2000. Good question, Guy. If everyone does their "standard" approach that is different than everyone else's standard then there is no "standard" and things can get a bit dicey in the pattern. Jeff Edwards -------------------------------1138287109 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message dated 1/25/2006 11:31:13 PM Central Standard Time,=20 bnn@nethere.com writes:

<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>Just=20 where in the FAR/AIM is the "Overhead approach" defined? And where and in=20 what civil rating is it taught? I know it did not appear in the PTS for=20
the private rating in 2000.

Good question, Guy. If everyone does their "standard" approach that is=20 different than everyone else's standard then there is no "standard" and thin= gs=20 can get a bit dicey in the pattern.

Jeff Edwards

-------------------------------1138287109--