X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 00:28:36 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-954202@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <sportform@cox.net>
Received: from fed1rmmtai02.cox.net ([68.230.241.57] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.7f)
  with ESMTP id 953318 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:20:38 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.57; envelope-from=sportform@cox.net
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (really [70.187.129.106]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP
          id <20060125155010.PPKU20441.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@[10.0.1.2]>
          for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:50:10 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623)
In-Reply-To: <list-952947@logan.com>
References: <list-952947@logan.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-33-983301212
X-Original-Message-Id: <c00654ae673d3e68f4791cb1e5affa1c@cox.net>
From: Barry Hancock <sportform@cox.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Low Passes
X-Original-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:51:31 -0800
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623)


--Apple-Mail-33-983301212
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=ISO-8859-1;
	format=flowed


On Jan 24, 2006, at 10:54 PM, Hamid A. Wasti wrote:

>  Barry Hancock wrote:
>> IF you truly understand the hazards/risks of what you are doing, you=20=

>> can mitigate the risk.believe that they truly understand, when in=20
>> reality they do not. =A0Therein lies the problem in so many avenues =
of=20
>> human endeavor. =A0Unfortunately, when the individual realizes this=20=

>> discrepancy, there is a price to pay -- sometimes a very heavy price.
>>
Roger that.

One thing that has not been thrown at this dead horse is the fact that=20=

IF you are going to be low...slow is not the part of the envelope to be=20=

in....for a whole host of reasons....  Hard to convert airspeed to=20
useable altitude with 100 knots on the meter....

Barry



--Apple-Mail-33-983301212
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=ISO-8859-1



On Jan 24, 2006, at 10:54 PM, Hamid A. Wasti wrote:


<excerpt> Barry Hancock wrote:

<excerpt>IF you <italic>truly</italic> understand the hazards/risks of
what you are doing, you can mitigate the risk.<italic>believe</italic>
that they truly <italic>understand</italic>, when in reality they do
not. =A0Therein lies the problem in so many avenues of human endeavor.
=A0Unfortunately, when the individual realizes this discrepancy, there
is a price to pay -- sometimes a very heavy price.


</excerpt></excerpt>Roger that.


One thing that has not been thrown at this dead horse is the fact that
IF you are going to be low...slow is not the part of the envelope to
be in....for a whole host of reasons....  Hard to convert airspeed to
useable altitude with 100 knots on the meter....


Barry




--Apple-Mail-33-983301212--