X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [69.171.52.140] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 5.0.5)
  with HTTP id 905091 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:12:13 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Operating over congested areas
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.0.5
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:12:13 -0500
Message-ID: <web-905091@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051229145239.76259.qmail@web61321.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20051229145239.76259.qmail@web61321.mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for Charlie Kohler <charliekohler@yahoo.com>:

  I am not a lawyer nor able to guess what FAA legal would "go after"  but I
personally would not worry about this. My first worry would be to keep it
running
  and prevent the off airport event. Do NOT ignore warning signs. Plenty of
fuel/oil. Make fuel press/flow a primary scan instrument w/oil press/temp.
  Next- keep every aspect of the flight legal. AROW? Pilot
Currency-weather-Condition Inspections etc etc .
  If really in doubt-  pose the question in writing to the Airworthiness
Manager at the Local FSDO. Then you have a document--  for whatever thats
worth. At least you can send it to the EAA and AOPA legal team.
  Charlie K.