In a message dated 12/28/2005 9:51:24 P.M. Central Standard Time,
skipslater@earthlink.net writes:
The
primary supplier if the EI's in use in the experimental market is Klaus
Sauvier and he refuses to provide anyone any data on the timing curves used in
the LSE ignitions. Without that, nobody can do a thorough analysis of
them because they have no manufacturer's baseline to work with. It's
that lack of data that gives pause to the Ada guys recommending something they
can't put on their test stand with hard data
points.
Skip,
We, the members of the LML, have the opportunity to fill in the timing data
for the LSE. I have some for the way I fly, but not all the points over a
more complete power range. Interestingly, we can calculate the
Electroair numbers by referring to the CAFE article on EIs that identified
the parameters and resulting timing function.
We could indeed form a spreadsheet for O, IO and Turbo engines from 320 to
360 to 550 at different power levels based on RPM and MAP, for single and dual
LSE systems. Consider that the base timing is set to 20 degrees
BTDC for CRs greater than or equal to 8.7 and 25 degrees for CRs lower than
that (I believe the curve is the same otherwise). The LSE
site indicates other curves are available for Turbo engines.
Additionally, we could note the change in timing if only one of a dual LSE
system is operating (partial failure mode). Could I see the hands of those
operating LSE ignitions with the display module? Note also that the curves
are "hard wired" for I read somewhere that LSE is not using any "computer"
processing.
Perhaps when the weather is better, LSE Lancair users could gather at some
central location and collect the data over a weekend, putting to rest the lack
of information about the timing.
For now and for my engine, an IO 320 with a 9:1 CR Iridium auto plugs
and mag gear timing sensors, I have verified that the timing agrees with a
base of 20 DBTDC. At various RPM, I will see a difference of .5 to 1.2
degrees between the two ignitions. I usually report the earlier timing -
the first to fire. I don't know how accurate the LSE display is because of
the difference between it and the VM EPI 800 engine monitor with respect to
MAP and RPM with the LSE display being pretty jumpy. Only the timing data
comes from the LSE display.
For starters, here are some data points I stumbled on that were
recorded last May, before secret airframe airspeed mods and over a rather
narrow power range (I hope the text spacing holds up):
LSE DATA (5-15-05
Baro Alt
Temp IAS TAS MAP RPM CHT EGT Cyl GPH
Timing
30.00 5500 15C 165 182 23
2390
8.9
26.5
6500
178
197
25
2510
380
1300 4
10.6
25.0
370
1300 2
360
1280 3
370
1270 1
29.72 4600 14C 170 184 23.5 2350 360 1270 4
8.9
26.2
350
1270 3
350
1270 2
360
1250 1
29.72 3500 14C 162 170 21.2 2450
8.0
28.0
29.98 4500 13C 183 195 25
2510
370
1290 4
10.8
24.5
360
1280 3
350
1300 2
360
1280 1
29.96 9500 14C 168 198 22.1 2510 390 1290 4
9.2
27.0
370
1270 3
370
1290 2
370
1260 1
30.08 6500 15C 178 198 25
2500
370
1300 4
10.6
24.5
360
1290 3
360
1300 2
370
1270 1
30.08 8400 13C 170 195 23.1 2510
26.5
Sorry about the missing numbers,
writing is such a pain - I hope somebody out there automatically records
engine data.
Scott Krueger
AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL (KARR)
Happy
New Year to all!