X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 18:42:57 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c3) with ESMTP id 753624 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 14:16:11 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.28; envelope-from=WarbirdAeroPress@cox.net Received: from DELL ([24.251.75.43]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20051008181520.NMIM9394.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@DELL> for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 14:15:20 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <03b801c5cc34$3e22f050$6501a8c0@DELL> From: "Scotty G" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Lancair 360 w Thielert diesel X-Original-Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 11:15:14 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_03B3_01C5CBF9.8E633A10" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_03B3_01C5CBF9.8E633A10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Why would you choose a lower horsepower engine over a standard = installation with more smash? Just curious. Scotty G www.UnleashedAirRacing.com www.SeptemberPops.com www.WarbirdAeroPress.com All mail is scanned for viruses. ------=_NextPart_000_03B3_01C5CBF9.8E633A10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Why would you choose a lower horsepower engine over = a standard=20 installation with more smash? Just curious.

Scotty G
www.UnleashedAirRacing.com=
www.SeptemberPops.com
www.WarbirdAeroPress.com

All mail is scanned for viruses.

------=_NextPart_000_03B3_01C5CBF9.8E633A10--