X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 09:26:30 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ylpvm15.prodigy.net ([207.115.57.46] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c3) with ESMTP id 745644 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 00:58:45 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.115.57.46; envelope-from=c177av8r@pacbell.net Received: from pimout6-ext.prodigy.net (pimout6-int.prodigy.net [207.115.4.22]) by ylpvm15.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j934w8KE019813 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 00:58:08 -0400 X-ORBL: [67.116.68.5] DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=sbc01; d=pacbell.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:x-mailer:x-accept-language: mime-version:to:subject:references:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=I5vAWnFynJ81M62Bf++KXKw6zBs+rVS6SQgLyYmHoK4SrXarG9qhEkHQ4lGJmjDoL QlDPJDMNbHDWVRMJvABCw== Received: from pacbell.net (ppp-67-116-68-5.dialup.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.116.68.5]) by pimout6-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.4 outbound domainkey aix/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j934vh3O368768 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 00:57:59 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <43400F57.5278BF4F@pacbell.net> X-Original-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 09:48:23 -0700 From: Duane Allen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Non-Certified Aircraft References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Well, actually, yes. The main difference in that and commercial aircraft now is that there are two pilots up front whom one of is supposed to be awake at all times to monitor the computers that fly the airplane. And of course, when out of radar contact with the controlling agency, reporting lat/long regularly. I'm sure you've read the stories of center not being able to reach an aircraft for long periods of time. This often happens when all flight deck crew fall asleep at the same time. Of course, they claim radio failure. I've entered the flight deck and found the pilot asleep, the first officer reading a magazine (while dozing) and the flight engineer asleep. Did it bother me? Not really. Once the computer takes over, usually passing 50ft. agl, it is all automatic thereafter. Once on final, one of them pushes the pilot disconnect button and lands the airplane. I have not personally landed a UAV by computer, but have watched it happen. We will be there before too long. We are just a lot more conservative in our operations than the companies who are demonstrating hands off on take off to landing. The company which builds the UAVs we are flying also built the one which flew across the Atlantic with fuel remaining. Granted, not much, but there was fuel in the tank when it landed. I know this is off subject, but you asked here. This thread is closed as far as I am concerned. duane Marvin Kaye wrote: > > Posted for Micah Froese : > > Would you ride in that UAV across the Atlantic in bad weather? > > Micah Froese > > > """ > That is not all that far away. We are doing that now with > UAVs. There is a person monitoring the flight with a computer, in my case a > laptop. duane UAV flight test director ARC > """ > > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/