X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [69.171.52.140] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 5.0c2) with HTTP id 725000 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 11:08:37 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: FW: Re: FAA Trying to stop us all? To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.0c2 Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 11:08:37 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <000c01c5bb91$ef8a7dd0$6801a8c0@compaqvdhfeuva> References: <000c01c5bb91$ef8a7dd0$6801a8c0@compaqvdhfeuva> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Jack Cowell [mailto:jackcowell@optonline.net] Rick Schrameck: After reading a number of posts on the amateur-built rules and Epic, I have some questions and observations. 1) Are you saying that the 1500shp, 350-knot, six-seater Epic being built at your (I'm told) impressively large facility is the same as a builder going through an assist program like Lancair's? 2) Does that mean that your Epic customers are going to hitch up their trailers or rig a truck to take their planes home and complete them? 3) Isn't possible that your Epic turboprop has pushed the FAA and its amateur-built rules and approval structure a bit too far? Granted, some professional builders stretch the FAA envelope, too, but most of these are (very) small businesses - not build facilities with millions of dollars of investment capital targeted at the development and manufacture of a far more complex aircraft than any complex kit a builder could actually make himself. To equate Epic's build program with these one-person or very small builder shops and/or Lancair's builder assist program would tax even your considerable salesmanship capabilities. Further, remember that rules are always subject to interpretation, which is why we have judges and juries and a court system (flawed though they may be). In the case of Epic's build program and construction complexity, it may be this interpretation capability that thwarts it. All said and done, it seems to me that though it is possible that the recent notification by the FAA has, as you say, "Nothing to do with Epic", nevertheless aircraft like Epic will be scrutinized extremely thoroughly if they continue to try to get approvals resulting in airworthiness certificates as amateur-built, experimental aircraft.