X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:30:41 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <210flyer@earthlink.net> Received: from smtpauth07.mail.atl.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c2) with ESMTP id 722698 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:49:38 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.67; envelope-from=210flyer@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=tWw1nD/zJtmXCM5ruPWiKeMNfkNKNqRoYr4upXCGwWmm5TuIcXMHaJSFECtmTkyd; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:thread-index:X-MimeOLE:Message-ID:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [68.166.211.175] (helo=dune) by smtpauth07.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EFv2j-0007b8-6c for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:48:53 -0400 From: "Mike Hutchins" <210flyer@earthlink.net> X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: [LML] Turbo Diesel vs. Turbo Gas (JET A vs. 100LL) X-Original-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 08:48:48 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0041_01C5B9D2.4A71CD50" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 thread-index: AcW6BJSQ6l7jbHPETyG+2+7KFD8OYA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Original-Message-ID: X-ELNK-Trace: 96606e18df264d301aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79d5c3142a99bba23841929e8689d585f5350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 68.166.211.175 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0041_01C5B9D2.4A71CD50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit George and Walter, Thank you for the additional data points on the 550 engines. I happen to fly one of the worst engines (TSIO-520R) from an efficiency standpoint and could only remember the data points for my peers flying some of the marginally more efficient Cessnas. Of course, even my engine LOP is more efficient than the best engine running ROP. Now, if we only had a fuel injection system that would allow us to set a particular fuel flow or lambda value. Best Regards, Mike ------=_NextPart_000_0041_01C5B9D2.4A71CD50 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

George and Walter,

 

Thank you for the additional data points on the 550 = engines.

 

I happen to fly one of the worst engines (TSIO-520R) = from an efficiency standpoint and could only remember the data points for my = peers flying some of the marginally more efficient Cessnas. Of course, even my = engine LOP is more efficient than the best engine running ROP. Now, if we only = had a fuel injection system that would allow us to set a particular fuel flow = or lambda value…

 

Best Regards,

Mike

------=_NextPart_000_0041_01C5B9D2.4A71CD50--