X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:08:36 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from esmtp.cave.com ([66.35.72.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c1) with ESMTP id 669702 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:56:21 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.35.72.5; envelope-from=lancair@ustek.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([66.35.73.227]) by esmtp.cave.com (VisNetic.MailServer.v7.2.4.1) with ASMTP id CQN38002 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:55:36 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <4300E527.3030609@ustek.com> X-Original-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:55:35 -0400 From: N301ES Reply-To: lancair@ustek.com Organization: USTEK Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Belly Wash References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040909000104090706030001" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040909000104090706030001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have used waterless hand cleaner with good success. Just make sure that it does not contain pumice! :-o Robert M. Simon, ES-P N301ES babyblue wrote: > Could anyone recommend a good safe wash for exhaust stains on the > belly of my ES ? Thankyou. > > Don Grabiel N722B --------------040909000104090706030001 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have used waterless hand cleaner with good success.

Just make sure that it does not contain pumice! :-o

Robert M. Simon, ES-P N301ES

babyblue wrote:

Could anyone recommend a good safe wash for exhaust stains on the belly of my ES ? Thankyou.

Don Grabiel N722B

--------------040909000104090706030001--