Return-Path: Received: from olympus.net ([198.133.237.1]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 01:49:40 -0400 Received: from sq19436.olympus.net ([207.149.194.36] helo=bill) by olympus.net with smtp (Exim 2.02 #1) id 11E4qR-0000Wu-00 for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 22:53:08 -0700 Message-ID: <00bb01bee2f4$96b38e80$1bc295cf@bill> From: "William T Bartlett" To: References: <19990810043622.AAA26958@truman.olsusa.com> Subject: Transfer to header tank? Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 22:52:05 -0700 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I patiently read through the header tank transfer opinions before, and still didn't understand the reason to transfer fuel to the header tank. In the original LanceAir (note that spelling) 200, with a Continental O 200 and no fuel pump, I could understand some reason, but scary with less than 14" of head. Will some one please explain in simple terms why most builders (the ones that didn't decide they didn't like a tank in the cockpit and can't) insist on transferring fuel to the header tank. It seems to only complicate the system and increase the pilot load. Please use simple words and no electronic fuel level switches. Bill N7WB >I never forget to transfer fuel to the header tank. I just forget to shut >transfer pumps off. Not indefinately, but usually long enough to stain the >bottom of the aircraft. " Ah #@&%$*+!!!", say I, or some similar expletive. >The vast majority of you have never done this, but there may be another soul >out there who experiences the occassional "senior moment". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html