Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #30028
From: Ed McCauley <ed.mccauley@bltinc.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: re: [LML] Re: Emergency Landings
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 10:08:17 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Barry:

You're right.  And a good topic to continue upon however, my point was to loose significant altitude (say 5000 feet) in a controlled and predictable manor after arriving above a suitable landing site.  Clearly there are MANY ways of loosing 5000 I just picked this one because it kept me, at best glide, pretty close over head.

Ed McCauley


 >>  On May 13, 2005, at 7:49 AM, Ed McCauley wrote:

 >>  >  I even had the altitude lost per standard rate turn at best glide
 >>  > memorized so I could cognizantly bleed off any extra if I was really
 >>  > high (the goal).

 >>  Someone on this list surely knows better than I, so please speak up,
 >>  but I do believe that a standard rate turn will result in a greater
 >>  loss of altitude per degree of turn than a steeper bank turn.  For
 >>  example, in my Yak or CJ-6, the most effective bank angle for a power
 >>  out turn back is 45 degrees of bank....

 >>  Anyone?

 >>  Barry


 >>  --
 >>  For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster