X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 12:02:56 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from HQEMGATE01.nvidia.com ([216.228.112.170] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 939775 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 11 May 2005 10:29:03 -0400 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.228.112.170; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net Received: from hqemfe02.nvidia.com (Not Verified[172.16.227.92]) by HQEMGATE01.nvidia.com id ; Wed, 11 May 2005 07:28:14 -0700 Received: from thelma.nvidia.com ([172.16.228.84]) by hqemfe02.nvidia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 11 May 2005 07:28:17 -0700 Received: from ccaselt (cvpn2-4-101.nvidia.com [10.2.4.101]) by thelma.nvidia.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA09849 for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 07:28:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <014501c55635$abaec420$6904020a@nvidia.com> From: "colyncase on earthlink" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Shannon's Accident Summarized X-Original-Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 07:07:38 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0135_01C555F8.1D6CB100" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Original-Return-Path: colyncase@earthlink.net X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 May 2005 14:28:17.0288 (UTC) FILETIME=[AC3D4880:01C55635] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0135_01C555F8.1D6CB100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Looks like I fumbled a sentence in there. I meant to say in a Lancair = things may not happen quite as quickly as a Vmc engine out, but still = pretty quickly and it can degenerate from there in a hurry. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: colyncase on earthlink=20 To: Lancair Mailing List=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 6:33 AM Subject: [LML] Re: Shannon's Accident Summarized Jeff, thanks for your post. I've read everything on the HPAT site. = ...and I have a question, which I will get to. I think everybody knows of someone that predictably died in an = airplane but I am totally unconvinced that all people that die at the = controls are people that would give you stupid answers if you posed a = situation on the ground. Under the stress of circumstances people do = some pretty weird things. Flight Safety appears to go after this = problem by strapping you in the sim and inflicting you with these = situations over and over until your reactions are the correct ones. A = really obvious example is engine failure in a twin near Vmc. That = particular one is not one you get in a Lancair but other things and = degenerate pretty quickly. My question: How much of that sort of hands-on, = deal-with-it-in-realtime exposure do you get with the HPAT program? Colyn Case LIV-P ----- Original Message -----=20 From: VTAILJEFF@aol.com=20 To: Lancair Mailing List=20 Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 8:57 PM Subject: [LML] Re: Shannon's Accident Summarized In a message dated 5/10/2005 9:14:16 A.M. Central Standard Time, = marv@lancaironline.net writes: Perhaps it is time to organize and dedicate ourselves to an agreed creed, mission statement, or whatever to see this happen. = Sometimes a written and signed commitment to ourselves and each other works = as a great reminder. =20 Bryan Burr Bryan and others, You all are right on the mark-but a signed piece of paper is no = substitute for great training. Lancair and High Performance Aircraft = Training has been offering initial and recurrent training for the last = year and a half. We had a great turnout in Florida for the Sebring but = the weather did not cooperate fully (low IFR Friday -Sunday). Training = was supposed to be held next weekend in Hondo but has been canceled due = to lack of interest.=20 Pete, Dave and I have given ground school at the last two Lancair = fly-ins, free forums at Oshkosh, etc. Walter & George Braly give very = good (read great) advice and information on engine operation and their = Advanced Pilot Seminar in Ada, OK is recommended for all piston = operators.=20 The sad fact is annual Lancair recurrent flight training turnout is = very light. Some pilots think that a "Joe bag of donuts" 18 year old = brand new CFI with zero hours in a Lancair is an adequate substitute. If = you really wan to avoid what happened to Shannon, then commit yourself = to a good thorough review with HPAT. Regards, Jeff Edwards LIVP N619SJ=20 CFI (I), MEI=20 2003 National Flight Instructor of the Year ------=_NextPart_000_0135_01C555F8.1D6CB100 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Looks like I fumbled a sentence in there.   I meant to = say in a=20 Lancair things may not happen quite as quickly as a Vmc engine out, but = still=20 pretty quickly and it can degenerate from there in a hurry.
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 colyncase on earthlink =
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 = 6:33=20 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: Shannon's = Accident=20 Summarized

Jeff,
    thanks for your post.   I've read = everything=20 on the HPAT site.  ...and I have a question, which I will get = to.
 
    I think everybody knows of someone that = predictably=20 died in an airplane but I am totally unconvinced that all people that = die at=20 the controls are people that would give you stupid answers if you = posed a=20 situation on the ground.   Under the stress of circumstances = people=20 do some pretty weird things.    Flight Safety appears = to go=20 after this problem by strapping you in the sim and inflicting you with = these=20 situations over and over until your reactions are the correct=20 ones.    A really obvious example is engine failure in = a twin=20 near Vmc.  That particular one is not one you get in a = Lancair=20 but other things and degenerate pretty quickly.
 
    My question:   How much of that sort = of=20 hands-on, deal-with-it-in-realtime exposure do you get with the HPAT=20 program?
 
Colyn Case
LIV-P
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 VTAILJEFF@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 = 8:57=20 PM
Subject: [LML] Re: Shannon's = Accident=20 Summarized

In a message dated 5/10/2005 9:14:16 A.M. Central Standard = Time, marv@lancaironline.net=20 writes:
Perhaps it is time to organize and dedicate ourselves to = an=20 agreed
  creed, mission statement, or whatever to see this = happen.  Sometimes a
  written and signed commitment = to=20 ourselves and each other works as a
  great = reminder.
 =20
  Bryan Burr
Bryan and others,
 
You all are right on the mark-but a signed piece of paper is no = substitute for great training. Lancair and High Performance Aircraft = Training has been offering initial and recurrent training for the = last year=20 and a half. We had a great turnout in Florida for the Sebring but = the=20 weather did not cooperate fully (low IFR Friday -Sunday). Training = was=20 supposed to be held next weekend in Hondo but has been canceled = due to=20 lack of interest.
 
Pete, Dave and I have given ground school at the last two = Lancair=20 fly-ins, free forums at Oshkosh, etc. Walter & George Braly give = very=20 good (read great) advice and information on engine operation and = their=20 Advanced Pilot Seminar in Ada, OK is recommended for all piston = operators.
 
The sad fact is annual Lancair recurrent flight training = turnout is=20 very light. Some pilots think that a "Joe bag of donuts" = 18 year=20 old brand new CFI with zero hours in a Lancair is an adequate = substitute. If=20 you really wan to avoid what happened to Shannon, then commit = yourself to a=20 good thorough review with HPAT.
 
Regards,
 
Jeff Edwards
LIVP N619SJ
CFI (I), MEI
2003 National Flight Instructor of the Year
 
------=_NextPart_000_0135_01C555F8.1D6CB100--