X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:17:50 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from relay01.mail-hub.dodo.com.au ([203.220.32.149] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c4) with ESMTP id 870122 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 02:28:08 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=203.220.32.149; envelope-from=goconnell@dodo.com.au Received: from [10.2.3.72] (helo=DodoInternetWebmailServer) by relay01.mail-hub.dodo.com.au with smtp (Exim 3.36 #2) id 1DMKIS-0004u0-00 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:27:20 +1000 Received: from client 203.221.83.150 for UebiMiau2.7 (webmail client); Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:27:20 +1000 X-Original-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:27:20 +1000 From: "Gerard O Connell" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Reply-to: "Gerard O Connell" Subject: Re: which shocks are best? X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Dodo Internet Webmail Server X-Original-IP: 203.221.83.150 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MSMail-Priority: Medium Importance: Medium Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"; MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Message-Id: Thanks Scott, good feedback..I understand that the TK5's may leave you stranded if they deflate? Can this be resolved in the field and have you had it happen?

--
Gerard O Connell
Melbourne, Australia
VH-LPD (LNC2)
I have over 550 landings in at least 5 years on the TK5s without a failure.  Some landings have been too fast, some have been too "firm" but the TK5s have always performed beautifully regardless of what silly landing experiment I was trying that day. 
 
Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL (KARR)




________________________________________________

Message sent using Dodo Internet Webmail Server