Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.163.227] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3c2) with HTTP id 794890 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:15:00 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: supershargers To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3c2 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:15:00 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1e8.371bee12.2f688d8e@aol.com> References: <1e8.371bee12.2f688d8e@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for REHBINC@aol.com: Expanding ever so slightly on George's statement: During periods when you can't possibly make too much power, there really isn't a need for compressor speed control. However, much of the time you either need, or want, to operate at lower power settings than the engine is capable of, such as taxiing and low altitude flight. In such conditions you can use the throttle to reduce manifold pressure, or you can reduce the compressor output, or both. Since it takes power to run the compressor, it is much more efficient to reduce the compressor output. In periods where the limiting factor is manifold pressure or cylinder temperature, the reduction in compressor output diverts additional power to the propeller, so you climb faster while you save fuel. Remeber that an engine is most efficient with the throttle wide open. Rob