Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:35:59 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m17.mx.aol.com ([64.12.138.207] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 779510 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:23:37 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.138.207; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-m17.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id q.1fa.4b1c7d5 (3310) for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:22:47 -0500 (EST) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <1fa.4b1c7d5.2f6311c7@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:22:47 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Walter - Target EGT query X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1110554567" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5000 -------------------------------1110554567 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 In a message dated 3/11/2005 8:59:59 A.M. Central Standard Time, =20 lorn@dynacomm.ws writes: Your fuel injection apparently gives you much more fuel flow than my =20 carburetor. I climb out at 10 GPH with full throttle, full rich mixture =20 and 2,600 rpm with EGTs of about 1,500=B0F. I use 1,400=B0F as my climb =20 target. When in cruse I am also at between 1,400=B0F and 1,450=B0F with =20 CHTs of between 320=B0F and 370=B0F. Lorn, =20 Take a look at this: =20 _http://www.farwestaviation.com/about.html_=20 (http://www.farwestaviation.com/about.html)=20 =20 (http://www.farwestaviation.com/about.html#)=20 =20 For lean of peak operations (LOP), the claim is that there is a direct =20 linear relationship between GPH and HP. =20 Not so direct when running rich of peak (ROP). BTW, I am using 15.4 GPH at= =20 take off. =20 Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96 Aurora, IL (KARR) Fair and Balanced Opinions at No Charge! Metaphysical Monologues used at your own Risk. -------------------------------1110554567 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message dated 3/11/2005 8:59:59 A.M. Central Standard Time,=20 lorn@dynacomm.ws writes:

<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>Your=20 fuel injection apparently gives you much more fuel flow than my=20
carburetor. I climb out at 10 GPH with full throttle, full rich mixtur= e=20
and 2,600 rpm with EGTs of about 1,500=B0F. I use 1,400=B0F as my clim= b=20
target. When in cruse I am also at between 1,400=B0F and 1,450=B0F wit= h=20
CHTs of between 320=B0F and 370=B0F.

Lorn,

Take a look at this:

http://www.farwestaviatio= n.com/about.html

For lean of peak operations (LOP), the claim is that there is a direct=20 linear relationship between GPH and HP.

Not so direct when running rich of peak (ROP). BTW, I am using 15= .4=20 GPH at take off.

Scott Krueger=20 AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL (KARR)

Fai= r=20 and Balanced Opinions at No Charge!
Metaphysical Monologues used at your=20= own=20 Risk.

-------------------------------1110554567--