Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:01:57 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from systems3.net ([68.14.236.16] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP-TLS id 741351 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:42:54 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.14.236.16; envelope-from=cberland@systems3.net Received: from systems0d3b724 ([192.168.1.81]) by systems3.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Debian-12) with SMTP id j1GEg9sj010182 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 07:42:09 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <006101c51434$e4cc3410$5101a8c0@systems0d3b724> From: "Craig Berland" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mail List" Subject: [LML] Re: EGT's on O-360 X-Original-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 07:36:20 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0057_01C513FA.356FFA90" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75-1, clamav-milter version 0.75c on linux X-Virus-Status: Clean This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C513FA.356FFA90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Walter said...Most of what you said in this post, I am in agreement = over. Interestingly enough, I find no disagreement with what you posted = below and what George posted that you originally seemed to have = disagreed with. ????? My intent was not to disagree but to carry the thought process further. = It's hard to analyze exhaust gas temp vs ignition system without looking = at the bigger picture. That is: what variables are present in many = aircraft. As I mentioned once previously, I am very jealous of all of = you flying new and well maintained lawn darts and IV-P's. I'm flying an = old POS Cherokee where a lot of the marginal conditions I described are = everyday occurrences. The plane(s) still pass the 100 hr. I was an = Engine Engineer at General Motors when cars went from distributors with = mechanical advance and carburetors to ECM's firing the ignition and = electronic injectors. Believe me, it was a God send for a development = engineer. I know this thread is drifting, but look at all of the = wonderful things the computer has done for avionics (Chelton EFIS for = example). Well the same number of wonderful things could be done for = engine/prop management if electronics could/would be incorporated. Maybe = that subconscious desire causes me to respond in the manner I do/did. Craig Berland ------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C513FA.356FFA90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Walter said...Most of what you said in this post, I am in = agreement=20 over. Interestingly enough, I find no disagreement with what you posted = below=20 and what George posted that you originally seemed to have disagreed = with.=20 ?????
 
My intent was not to disagree but to = carry the=20 thought process further. It's hard to analyze exhaust gas temp vs=20 ignition system without looking at the bigger picture.  That = is:=20  what variables are present in many aircraft. As I mentioned once=20 previously, I am very jealous of all of you flying new and well = maintained lawn=20 darts and IV-P's. I'm flying an old POS Cherokee where a lot of the = marginal=20 conditions I described are everyday occurrences. The plane(s) still pass = the 100=20 hr. I was an Engine Engineer at General Motors when cars went from = distributors=20 with mechanical advance and carburetors to ECM's firing the ignition and = electronic injectors. Believe me, it was a God send for a development = engineer.=20 I know this thread is drifting, but look at all of the wonderful = things the=20 computer has done for avionics (Chelton EFIS for example).  Well = the same=20 number of wonderful things could be done for engine/prop management if=20 electronics could/would be incorporated. Maybe that subconscious desire = causes=20 me to respond in the manner I do/did.
Craig = Berland
------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C513FA.356FFA90--