Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 08:48:51 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-729502@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <needforspeed@cox-internet.com>
Received: from fe6.cox-internet.com ([66.76.2.51] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1)
  with ESMTP id 729437 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:54:32 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.76.2.51; envelope-from=needforspeed@cox-internet.com
Received: from dgwest ([68.226.130.191]) by fe6.cox-internet.com
          (InterMail vK.4.04.00.00 201-232-137 license 2c0225210a073aa8d80c3b96b8e7ebaa)
          with SMTP id <20050215115342.XZPO355.fe6@dgwest>
          for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 05:53:42 -0600
X-Original-Message-ID: <003c01c51354$8603be20$bf82e244@lf.br.cox.net>
From: "Dana Westphal" <needforspeed@cox-internet.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <redirect-728134@logan.com>
Subject: Re: Unibits
X-Original-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 05:50:19 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200

Angier,

What's wrong with using Unibits to help cut the transition holes through the
hard points in the main spar?  They actually seem more "gentle" than the
Dremel cut-off wheels which sometimes tend to want to "melt/burn" the glass
if the rpm's get too high and/or the wheel gets dull ...

Dana Westphal
L2K-165
"Building over Geologic Time"



> Agier wrote:

> Hi Dana,
>
> Unibits are very useful but I do hope you don't use them or Anybits to
> cut holes in your main spar.
>
> Angier Ames
> N4ZQ...88.657%
>