Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 08:47:38 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.35] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 729237 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:37:40 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.157.35; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-d03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id q.78.6cc46226 (3924) for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:36:55 -0500 (EST) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <78.6cc46226.2f42e476@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:36:54 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: EGT's on O-360 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1108445814" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5000 -------------------------------1108445814 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2/13/2005 9:34:13 P.M. Central Standard Time, Walter@advancedpilot.com writes: All I said was that *all* of the effects are due to changes in timing (which would include the changes in EFFECTIVE timing) and nothing more. I asked you to hypothesize any different mechanism. You have not done that. All you did was post a bunch of non-responsive advertising hype. Whether the electrical charge comes from a capacitor, battery, lightening strike, or a mag makes no difference. You have yet to postulate how that can make a difference if the timing is not altered. Are you really suggesting that if the timing (or effective timing) is not altered these effects are seen based on the source of the electrons? You don't really claim that do you? Walter, All I said was "Electronic ignitions and "fine wire" plugs each can also reduce EGT temps .........." This statement comes from personal observations, comments made by others and yes, material describing generic electronic ignitions and exotic plugs, including claims made in the "hype" about PRISM. I don't have to hypothesize why these events occur or the physics behind such observations. If anything, I should be chastised for not mentioning that mis-timing (advancing) the engine can also cause lower than expected EGTs. Finally, if the source of the electrons and the resultant flame kernel cause a more complete burning, thus giving the appearance of earlier effective timing, so be it. Scott Krueger -------------------------------1108445814 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message dated 2/13/2005 9:34:13 P.M. Central Standard Time,=20 Walter@advancedpilot.com writes:

<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>All I=20 said was that *all* of the effects are due to changes in timing
(which= =20 would include the changes in EFFECTIVE timing) and nothing more.=20
I asked you to hypothesize any different mechanism. = You=20 have not
done that. All you did was post a bunch of non-responsi= ve=20 advertising
hype.

Whether the electrical charge comes from a=20 capacitor, battery,
lightening strike, or a mag makes no difference.&n= bsp;=20 You have yet to
postulate how that can make a difference if the timing= is=20 not altered.

Are you really suggesting that if the timing (or effec= tive=20 timing) is
not altered these effects are seen based on the source of t= he=20
electrons? You don't really claim that do=20 you?

Walter,

All I said was "Electronic ignitions and "fine wire" plugs each can als= o=20 reduce EGT temps .........."

This statement comes from personal observations, comments made by other= s=20 and yes, material describing generic electronic ignitions and exotic plugs,=20 including claims made in the "hype" about PRISM.

I don't have to hypothesize why these events occur or the physics behin= d=20 such observations. If anything, I should be chastised for not mentioni= ng=20 that mis-timing (advancing) the engine can also cause lower than expected=20 EGTs.

Finally, if the source of the electrons and the resultant flame ke= rnel=20 cause a more complete burning, thus giving the appearance of earlier effecti= ve=20 timing, so be it.

Scott Krueger

-------------------------------1108445814--