Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:33:51 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from lakermmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.240.29] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 727793 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:23:01 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.240.29; envelope-from=Walter@advancedpilot.com Received: from [10.0.1.3] (really [68.227.132.71]) by lakermmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with ESMTP id <20050214032215.QVGW3985.lakermmtao10.cox.net@[10.0.1.3]> for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:22:15 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Original-Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: W Atkinson Subject: Re: [LML] Re: EGT's on O-360 X-Original-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 21:22:15 -0600 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) Scott: All I said was that *all* of the effects are due to changes in timing (which would include the changes in EFFECTIVE timing) and nothing more. I asked you to hypothesize any different mechanism. You have not done that. All you did was post a bunch of non-responsive advertising hype. Whether the electrical charge comes from a capacitor, battery, lightening strike, or a mag makes no difference. You have yet to postulate how that can make a difference if the timing is not altered. Are you really suggesting that if the timing (or effective timing) is not altered these effects are seen based on the source of the electrons? You don't really claim that do you? Walter