Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:37:25 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta10.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.202] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 726597 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:49:47 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.168.78.202; envelope-from=dfs155@adelphia.net Received: from f3g6s4 ([67.22.49.202]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with SMTP id <20050212214855.MWLP24718.mta10.adelphia.net@f3g6s4> for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:48:55 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <003201c5114c$a8b136a0$ca311643@losaca.adelphia.net> From: "Dan Schaefer" X-Original-To: "Lancair list" Subject: Aluminum fittings X-Original-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:48:58 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Of primary concern are fittings that connect a hose or tubing from the engine (a real mover and shaker) to any fixed point, like the firewall, for instance. A fuel line running from a device on the firewall (perhaps the gascolator or maybe the boost pump) to the engine is definitely a prime candidate for steel fittings at both ends. As I understand it, the main problem here is the low-frequency stressing of the fittings due to relative movement between the engine and airframe. For peace of mind (and safety), it is prudent to opt for high-strength (steel) fittings where such flexure is imposed, and that goes for the hose-end fitting as well. The cylinder head oil return fittings (aluminum on Lycs) run between points on the engine (not between engine and a fixed dynamic ground), and are more likely to be affected by resonant vibration. However, they are so short that their resonant frequency is probably too high to be excited by any vibration the engine might produce. Since there's not much of a history of failure (if any) over the time that Lycomings have been using Al for these fittings, that's a pretty good life test that probably proves the point. On the other hand, Al fittings connected to an engine, and in particular ones that connect to an unsupported array of hoses or tubes, are suspect unless you can prove - by vibration testing - that they have no adverse resonant responses. You can test them in a qualified lab (not cheap or easy) or in the air in flight (easy but possibly deadly). IMHO, using steel fittings is a whole bunch cheaper, easier and definitely safer. On my early LNC2, I used steel for all gas and oil fittings that could possibly flex or be stressed by a shaking hose and purchased hoses with SS end-fittings from Sacramento Sky Ranch (which also included integral fire-sleeve). Why take a chance? Dan Schaefer