Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.163.60] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2.8)
  with HTTP id 602943 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:17:52 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] weird pressurization question
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2.8
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:17:52 -0500
Message-ID: <web-602943@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <E8D9A32F94C65B4AB6D8F4730E38460E2E69A8@sdf1.mail.taturbo.com>
References: <E8D9A32F94C65B4AB6D8F4730E38460E2E69A8@sdf1.mail.taturbo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "George Braly" <gwbraly@gami.com>:

  Horse Hocky.  I can think of a couple of ways to design that system.
  
  Vent the tank from the cabin with a check valve towards the tank.
  
  Vent the tank overboard with a restrictive orifice - -
  
  Add a  ½ psi  pop off valve to vent overboard in the event of sudden
  depressurization.
  
  Regards,  George
  

"""
  AS&T tells me that I can't vent to inside the cabin because of the alcohol
fumes.
  If I can't pressurize the tank it will have to deal with 3500 lbs. of
pressure on it.
"""