In a message dated 1/9/2005 9:14:15 A.M. Central Standard Time,
marv@lancaironline.net writes:
Jeff,
On the "3 for a short one" scenario, Are
you saying mainly that you don't
have enough useful load left to put in
fuel for a long trip with 3 or that the
3rd person is always uncomfortable
in a IVP?
Colyn,
Good question. I will take two passengers and offload fuel to make a 1-2
hour/ out and back day trip (no bags). But if I am taking bags I will
only take one other passenger and then always load the aft seat first and then
the baggage area. There is not enough useful load to make a max fuel/ max range
trip ( 4 hours ) with baggage and three souls on board. Three people are not
going to be comfortable for a four hour trip--especially when you have to FEDEX
their luggage and stop twice for fuel. The leg room in the back is non existent.
This ain't no Cessna 206-- but it is a heck of a lot faster. If you need to get
more passengers better buy another IVP cut off the left wing of one and the
right wing of the other and glue the whole thing together like the P-61.
Perhaps Lancair could design a six passenger aircraft that is about four
inches wider with the ES wing (could carry a bunch of fuel) and a Walter
engine. Or you could put down some cash for the Epic or a PC12.
There are very few aircraft out there that you can fill the seats and the
tanks and be legal and safe. Let me know if you find one.
Jeff