Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.41]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:10:13 -0400 Received: from ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com ([12.73.161.100]) by mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP id <19990624221314.IBIZ22412@ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com> for ; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 22:13:14 +0000 Message-ID: <002601bebe8d$a9145220$64a1490c@ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com> Reply-To: "Curtis Krouse" From: "Curtis Krouse" To: Subject: Re: Preparing for bonding Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:05:22 -0700 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I'm not sure that I agree with your statement that coarser sand paper provides more surface area. Here's my thinking....and I'm not saying that I'm right, but I do have a thought here (it happens once in awhile)....... I think that the finer sandpaper provides more surface area, because the grit has less distance between it. That provides more peaks and valleys, which in turn provide more surface area. If I use finer sand paper and get 100 groves per inch, I get more surface area than if I use a coarse paper and get only 10 grooves per inch. Thereby giving me more surface area. Who knows for sure? Curtis Krouse [I'm not a mathematician, but I think if you were to compare what we are doing to fractals you would, in fact, see that your assumption about finer grit providing more surface area is true. Given that fact, I still have a hard time reconciling my mind to the idea that I'll get better bonds if I prep with 180 grit instead of 40 grit. Talk about counter-intuitive. ] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html