Return-Path: Received: from pmc02.pmc.philips.com ([208.198.161.202]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:36:01 -0400 Received: from tong-1 (d174-168.pmc.philips.com [167.81.174.168]) by pmc02.pmc.philips.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/g) with SMTP id JAA20721 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:39:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990624094237.00a12c20@mailhost> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:42:37 -0700 To: lancair.list@olsusa.com From: Timothy Ong Subject: LNC2 shock length adjustment data X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> My name is Timothy Ong. I'm working on shocks for the 235/320/360 series of planes. >From discussion and comments, it seems quite clear that field adjustable shocks are a big plus. The existing prototypes that I have are adjustable internally. They approximately have 1.4" stroke. If you have less than 6" from eyelet to eyelet, this amount is subtracted from your total available stroke. Example: Shock length is 5.875...available stroke is 6-5.875=.125...1.4-.125= 1.275 Now, If I make it field adjustable from 6" to 5.875" then the person with 6" length has the same stroke as the 5.875" length. They both have 1.275" stroke. Here is what I need from all of you interested in these shocks. Would you please measure your center to center dimension of the eyelets on your shocks so I know what the maximum amount of adjustment required is. Lancair's specification says 6" to 5 7/8", but I wondering if that covers everybody. Thank you in advance for your help. Regards, Timothy Ong >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html