Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 14:26:06 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [199.185.220.224] (HELO priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 557816 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 13:01:49 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=199.185.220.224; envelope-from=npaczkowski@telus.net Received: from dad ([64.180.168.195]) by priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20041206180118.MICB942.priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net@dad> for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:01:18 -0700 From: "Nicholas Paczkowski" X-Original-To: Subject: Wing tips X-Original-Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:01:05 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0013_01C4DB7A.8022BDB0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcTbvY3in5x0KgutSsSmLA+QkHGuYA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Disposition-Notification-To: "Nicholas Paczkowski" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C4DB7A.8022BDB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I recently saw a L-IV with the standard wing tips permanently attached with access panels cut into the bottom of the the wingtip. The installation looked really neat. Is there any good reason why the wing tips ought not to be permanently attached? ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C4DB7A.8022BDB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I = recently saw a=20 L-IV with the standard wing tips permanently attached with access panels = cut=20 into the bottom of the the wingtip. The installation looked really=20 neat.

Is = there any good=20 reason why the wing tips ought not to be permanently=20 attached?

------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C4DB7A.8022BDB0--