Return-Path: Received: from imo21.mx.aol.com ([198.81.17.65]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 18 Jun 1999 11:06:58 -0400 Received: from IKOR1@aol.com (14428) by imo21.mx.aol.com (IMOv20) id kORa000666 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 1999 11:08:54 -0400 (EDT) From: IKOR1@aol.com Message-ID: <8ad9441.249bbb06@aol.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 11:08:54 EDT Subject: Composite Heat Transfer To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> It has been proposed that a heat exchanger would provide sufficient cooling for the Walters Turbine in a Lancair IV. Fuel, (kerosene) would be pumped through as the coolant, then various amounts of the warmed fuel consumed in combustion and the rest returned to the wing tanks. This prewarming would add to the efficiency of the turbine and additional efficiency would be realized from the absence of drag using air inlet system to provide cooling air. My question is how much heat could be transferred to the air over the wing. There are approximately 200 square feet of wing surface area when the tanks are full. The wing construction has the insulator of the honeycomb, but if some heat could be transferred from the wing to the air over the wing then not only would this system appear to have merit, it would provide for deicing as well. Walters 601D Lancair IV (nonP) now sitting on its gear. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html