Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:05:35 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m19.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.11] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.3) with ESMTP id 436239 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 01:22:56 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.11; envelope-from=Newlan2dl@aol.com Received: from Newlan2dl@aol.com by imo-m19.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.7.) id q.140.341d0883 (18403) for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 01:22:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Newlan2dl@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <140.341d0883.2e8ba090@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 01:22:24 EDT Subject: Different wing washout? X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1096435344" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5032 -------------------------------1096435344 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Mike Thanks for doing the work, I hope that inspires others to look at their wings. Weird about the ailerons being out in the center and not the LE and TE. What it sounds like is that the wing skins were warped probably in storage or in transit since all wings should stay the same if the tooling isn't messed around with. So if it was pulling away from the fixture in the factory tooling, it probably just wasn't noticed. But Tim is right, the relative flexibility of the skins would be locked up rigidly once the top and bottom were bonded together, so the different angles could very easily have been from the skin not resting properly in the fixture. Sorry for not emailing earlier, I was out of town. Dan -------------------------------1096435344 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Mike
 
Thanks for doing the work, I hope that inspires others to look at their= wings.  Weird about the ailerons being out in the center and not the L= E and TE.  What it sounds like is that the wing skins were warped proba= bly in storage or in transit since all wings should stay the same if the too= ling isn't messed around with.  So if it was pulling away from the fixt= ure in the factory tooling, it probably just wasn't noticed.  But Tim i= s right, the relative flexibility of the skins would be locked up rigidly on= ce the top and bottom were bonded together, so the different angles could ve= ry easily have been from the skin not resting properly in the fixture.
 
Sorry for not emailing earlier, I was out of town.
 
Dan
-------------------------------1096435344--