Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #24552
From: terrence o'neill <troneill@charter.net>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Epic aircraft
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 16:40:42 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Dear Edde,
Per AC 20-139A, FAA Pub 8130.2(D) and FAR 21.191(g), for qualifying to Register and becoming a Repairman:  The link says:
The fabrication and assembly operation listed in FAA Form 8000-38 are the ONLY things FAA inspectors are concerned with when determining the status of your amateur-built experimental aircraft.  If you have been 'involved in performing' ANY of these operations, you earned gained credit for having performed that operation and toward establishing amateur-built status for your plane. 
 
There are 119 fabrication and assembly operations for a standard fixed wing aircraft, and you'd need to be 'involved in'  60 of them.  That qualifies you as a Repairman for that plane, and for to register it. Hours or effort has nothing to do with it, says FAA.
 
    If your kit is already Registered, the next step is 'Certification', i.e. Airworthiness.  See FAA Advisory Circular 20-27F (dtd 9/26/03 ... so far)
The FAA is adding a lot of 'clarification' to their rules pertaining to kits, and for some reason these are more demanding for kits than those for Certifying a plans-built.  One would think the opposite should be true.  Further, they seem to be applying requirements published in just the last three or four years to as-yet-incomplete-kits which may be twenty years old or so ... confusing ' grandfather'... and lateralling it over to FAA DAR inspectors, who the builder pays, thereby creating a conflict of interest.  So, everybody's trying to make it work, and we just have to do the best we can, especially when buying and completing an older partially built kit.
 
Additional or contrary comments are invited.
T.
EAA 5572, tech Counslr/Flt. Advsr.
...working to certify  L235 kit 11
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 10:44 PM
Subject: [LML] Epic aircraft

I wonder if some of you got the announcement from Epic aircraft that they flew their first prototype recently.  The CEO is Rick Schrameck (my memory says - he's one of us, right?) Anyway, the price of the plane is $1.1 million but it will initially be certified in the "amateur built category".  I thought the rules were simply:  You build 51% of the plane and you get to fly in the 'experimental class'.  And you can sell the plane too.  If you don't build the plane, you buy a 'certified' model.  
 
If Rick is building planes for sale, he's the same as Piper and Cessna, and should be playing by the same rules.  Similarly for the 'builder assist' guys out there:  If you're building the IVs for other owners who have not put anywhere near 51% of the effort (who's kidding who here) then there's going to be trouble at some point. 
 
Maybe Epic's got it all worked out.  But this is no joke.  There are an awful lot of IVs going down and it's only a matter of time before someone takes out a school bus loaded with kids.  The paperwork better be squeaky clean, or, not only will there be hell to pay, but our category could be at risk.
 
Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm thinking that some guys (that are circumventing what I understand to be the spirit of the amateur built class, and probably not even on this list) are putting our existence at risk. 
 
I look forward to having my mind put at ease...
 
Ed de Chazal
Lowly 360 driver (and builder)
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster