Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:52:38 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-324065@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.218.85.32; envelope-from=naf@britevalley.com
From: "Paul Nafziger" <naf@britevalley.com>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Prop change
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
thread-index: AcRq7gkPEA7rTFyvQ1i/3moPPvE8GgAW35/g
In-Reply-To: <list-323109@logan.com>

My operating limitations specifies:

"After incorporating a major change as described in FAR 21.93, the aircraft
owner is required to re-establish compliance with FAR 91.319(b).  All
operations will be conducted day VFR in a sparsely populated area.  The
aircraft must remain in flight test for a minimum of 5 hours.  Persons
non-essential to the flight shall not be carried.  The aircraft owner shall
make a detailed log book entry describing the change prior to the test
flight.  Following satisfactory completion of the required number of flight
hours in the flight test area, the pilot shall certify in the record that
the aircraft has been shown to comply with FAR 91.319(b).  Compliance with
FAR 91.319(b) shall be recorded in the aircraft records with the following
or a similarly worded statement...."

Naf

Paul Nafziger
LNC2 N7PN
 

> >>> jschroeder@perigee.net 07/14/04 07:29PM >>>
>   Bill -
>   
>   I must have missed part of this thread, but what is "the 
> new wording" in
>   the phase two limitations??
> 
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/
>