Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:34:52 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d23.mx.aol.com ([205.188.139.137] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b8) with ESMTP id 321609 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:05:08 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.139.137; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-d23.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r2.6.) id q.a3.5e0e3f3e (4410) for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:52:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:52:07 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Prop change X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1089838327" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5000 -------------------------------1089838327 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 7/14/2004 9:14:39 AM Central Standard Time, Christopher.Zavatson@udlp.com writes: My operating limitations only require me to notify the FSDO of any major change per 21.93 and wait for a reply. In FAR 21.93 a major change is defined as <> I used to believe the definition for 'major alteration' as defined in 43 App. A was applicable, however in the applicability section (43.1) experimentals are specifically excluded. I also spoke with my insurance company, Avemco, who told me that as long as the FSDO was happy, they were happy. So the bottom line is, know what is in your operating limitations and talk to your local FSDO. They can all be different. FYI: _http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgFAR.nsf/0/C829507 D2CD1B48886256C59006640FF?OpenDocument_ (http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgFAR.nsf/0/C829507D2CD1B48886256C59006640FF?OpenDocument ) Is the text of 21.93. _http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgFAR.nsf/9e4d3c434 cb1bb7e852566c700670188!OpenView_ (http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgFAR.nsf/9e4d3c434cb1bb7e852566c700670188!OpenView) Is all the FARs Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk Sky2high@aol.com II-P N92EX IO320 Aurora, IL (KARR) LML, where ideas collide and you decide! -------------------------------1089838327 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 7/14/2004 9:14:39 AM Central Standard Time,=20 Christopher.Zavatson@udlp.com writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>My=20 operating limitations only require me to notify the FSDO of any major chan= ge=20 per 21.93 and wait for a reply.  In FAR 21.93 a major change is defin= ed=20 as <>
I used to believe the definition for 'major=20 alteration' as defined in 43 App. A was applicable, however in the=20 applicability section (43.1) experimentals are specifically excluded. = ; I=20 also spoke with my insurance company, Avemco, who told me that as long as=20= the=20 FSDO was happy, they were happy.
So the bottom line is, know what is in= =20 your operating limitations and talk to your local FSDO.  They can all= be=20 different.
FYI:
 
http://www.airweb.faa.gov/R= egulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgFAR.nsf/0/C829507D2CD1B48886256C59006640FF?= OpenDocument
 
Is the text of 21.93. 
 
http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulat= ory_and_Guidance_Library/rgFAR.nsf/9e4d3c434cb1bb7e852566c700670188!OpenView=
 
Is all the FARs=20
 
Scott Krueger=20 AKA Grayhawk
Sky2high@aol.com
II-P N92EX IO320 Aurora, IL=20 (KARR)

LML, where ideas collide and you=20 decide!
-------------------------------1089838327--