Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.162.59] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2b7)
  with HTTP id 251160 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 17:33:55 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 14V vs 28V
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2b7
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 17:33:55 -0400
Message-ID: <web-251160@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040708212804.10373.qmail@web51108.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20040708212804.10373.qmail@web51108.mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for Pat Weston <peweston@yahoo.com>:

  Besides thinner (barely) wires, the alternator will be
  the same size and effeciency as the 14V one. I fail to
  see any other advantage. There are many downsides, the
  plethora of automotive electrical part are now no
  longer accessable and you'll be limited to certified
  (read expensive and hard to obtain)aviation parts.
  
  Pat