In a message dated 4/27/2004 10:37:21 AM Central Standard Time,
rfreilich@sbcglobal.net writes:
Wendell was on an IFR flight plan with
an airplane that was NOT IFR equipped. 511WD was heavily and
exceptionally outfitted on the NAV/AP side but questionable on basic primary
instruments even for VFR sunny bunnies.
Rich,
Why are you so focused on what you don't know? Have you seen the log
books? If the plane was FAA FARs "not IFR equipped", then it is another
example of compounded judgement (no pun intended) error and illegal to
boot. If instruments were placed in illogical (not scan
friendly) places, another error in judgement and ergonomics. However,
the gear lights and switch are well located.
Maybe it was out of trim when the A/P disconnected or maybe, like the
Canadian Cirrus numbnut, the fuel load in the wings was so unbalanced that
any upset was not recoverable. Maybe the electrical system was not well
thought out and any failure was catastrophic - not like my certified Skymaster
that had all the interior lights on one breaker, lose one, lose'm all.
It is an experimental aircraft and most of us do better with our stuff
than rigidly fixed ancient erroneous designs forced to stay the same bad
way so that when you rent an aircraft, each one works the same bad way.
Sometimes, we just learn from other's mistakes if we know what they
were.
Scott Krueger
AKA Grayhawk
Sky2high@aol.com
II-P N92EX IO320 Aurora, IL
(KARR)
LML, where ideas collide and you
decide!