Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 10:39:39 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from qmail.accesscomm.ca ([204.83.142.82] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with SMTP id 2783302 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 10:27:27 -0500 Received: (qmail 25357 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 15:27:28 -0000 Received: from cust140-67.weyburn-leg.accesscomm.ca (HELO Jarrett) (216.174.140.67) by qmail.accesscomm.ca with SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 15:27:28 -0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <00ec01c3ba7b$1ec5d050$8200a8c0@Jarrett> From: "JJ JOHNSON" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Vortex Generators X-Original-Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 09:27:25 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Paul wrote; >Hence my question, why are we interested in doing that to > these high performance airplanes? I understand that you can lower your > stall speed, but who wants to do that at the expense of decreased > performance? Paul, I'll take a stab at it. I think the reason that this person isn't experiencing any drag increase [ or performance decrease] is probably directly linked to his a/c. We all know that Lance designed our Lnc2's w/ the NLF-0215 airfoil, which is a natural laminar airfoil. The problem arises when we as the builders built this a/c w/ this airfoil. There is no way that we are all getting our outter skins to form this airfoil exactly. If memory serves correct the 0215 has NLF [natural laminar flow] out to about 55% chord --> In best case wind tunnel conditions <-- and I think that is the key. In the real world we are probably only getting 35-40% NLF so if a person was to put their VG's at 25-30% chord there would be little effect to the laminar flow characteristics. The reason I feel we are only getting the little NLF that we are is because of the variables in leading edge shape as well as skin waviness and ruffness[not to mention bugs, rain or paint chips]. Not to sound like the total pessimist, the 0215 is a great airfoil and even though it is being used in the higher end of its intended Re# [remember this airframe/wing was originally intended to be flown w/ an 0-200]. Another point which I can't remember what the effect was, is the reflexing of the flaps, this enables us to fly at a different AOA than optimum and which I believe [don't quote me] isn't helping our NLF situation either. In the words or a wiser man "Asbestos flame suite on and ready.." Jarrett Johnson 235/320 55%