Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 21:29:11 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.22] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2774253 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:56:45 -0500 Received: from sdn-ap-002watacop0095.dialsprint.net ([63.187.200.95] helo=f3g6s4) by hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1APASa-0001yB-00 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:56:44 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <005201c3b481$e566b440$5fc8bb3f@f3g6s4> Reply-To: "Dan Schaefer" From: "Dan Schaefer" X-Original-To: "Lancair list" Subject: Re: air-oil separator X-Original-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:00:46 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Regarding Tom Williams' comment: "normally the idea of a air/oil separator is to return the oil that is blown out of the crankcase breather back to the crankcase. if you burn it in the exhaust, you may as well not even separate it!" That might have been one reason, Tom, but mine (and most guys I've talked with about it) was to get rid of the oily goop that always plastered itself to the belly of N235SP. The stuff that came out of the crankcase vent tube, and inevitably found it's way to the bottom of my airplane, was always sticky, picked up dirt and was hard to remove. Secondarily, once I saw what the catch-bottle was accumulating, there's no way I was going to stick it back in the engine! Bottom line: the A-O-separator primary purpose for me is to keep the bottom side cleaner (the old saw: Just keep the oily side down - doesn't work for me anymore). In my opinion, oil's cheaper than fixing what the condensate might (would?) do to my Lycoming. Dan Schaefer