Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc04.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.39]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 10:55:10 -0500 Received: from ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com ([12.65.19.178]) by mtiwmhc04.worldnet.att.net (InterMail v03.02.07 118 124) with SMTP id <19990329155716.CZXB12609@ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com> for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 15:57:16 +0000 Message-ID: <000e01be79fc$09ce7f40$b213410c@ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com> Reply-To: "Curtis Krouse" From: "Curtis Krouse" To: Subject: Re: Aileron idler arms & GM4 main mount bracket Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 07:51:37 -0800 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Marv, Thanks for the response. I did not do any sanding on the GM4 phenolic blocks. Common sense proved to be the better judge in that case. I have tried every combination that I could think of with these holes on the aileron idler arms, and the bottom line is that they line up 1 15/16" apart or they are so close that it would be almost impossible to disconnect them for wing disassembly. I haven't heard anything else from the list here about it. I suspect that the extra inch dimension will make a difference in how the controls handle, but whether that is a good difference or a bad difference I can't tell unless I see the whole linkage working. I don't know how much travel the idler arm does from full aileron deflection to the left or the right. But, I can guess that the closer the angle between the idler arm and the control rod becomes to a straight line the bigger the chance of the control being harder to correct back to neutral position. I'd like to hear from someone who has the hardware bracket kit installed to find out. I'll give it a couple days and then contact Lancair if I don't hear anything. I've got to order some rivet tools anyway in order to do the job, so I have time. Thanks, Curtis Krouse N753K