Return-Path: Received: from [67.20.112.52] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.6) with HTTP id 2707233 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 02 Nov 2003 22:17:15 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: TSIO-550E Surprise at 215 hrs. To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.6 Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 22:17:15 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <000001c3a1af$57f5c860$6401a8c0@DF6TS221> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Shannon Knoepflein" : I couldn't agree more with Jeff.I'd get a second opinion. To think that LOP operation could have caused this just seems crazy to me..I don't think LOP caused any damage (how could running cooler cause damage..and your comment about not enough lead to lubricate is an OWT in my opinion), and therefore, I'm really wondering if there actually is any damage. Hopefully George will chime in here and give his take. Jim, honestly, I'd get someone else to look at it. I just can't believe LOP could cause what you are suggesting..quite the opposite.LOP is likely the only way to get your TSIO to run past a few hundred hours. Shannon Supercharged Legacy "yeah, one of those guys" 120 hours and counting...